In your examples online, we have noticed that .Dispose() is never
called after using Chilkat classes (we are writing in C#).

Is calling .Dispose() recommended?  Does your code not need to destroy
any native resources or handles that would normally be cleaned up in
the Dispose method (the IDisposeable interface) ?


For objects that manage a TCP/IP socket connection with a server (FTP2, SSH, SFTP, POP3, SMTP, IMAP, HTTP, etc.) then calling Dispose will close the connection.  Aside from memory-usage and socket connections, there are no other resources used by Chilkat classes.  Dispose may also deallocate some internal memory.

The important thing to realize is that once Dispose is called, your code should not use that particular instance of the object again.  I always prefer a more explicit approach.  For example, instead of calling Chilkat.MailMan.Dispose to ensure that a connection to the SMTP server is closed, call Chilkat.MailMan.CloseSmtpConnection.  (If the mailman is not actually connected, calling CloseSmtpConnection does NOT result in an error.  It is harmless.)

Also, when an Chilkat object’s finalizer is called (i.e. when it is garbage-collected), any existing socket connections are closed and internal memory is (of course) deallocated.   You may force garbage collection by doing this (in C#)